This is my last post, before I go on break for a few days, but I have a question:
I've noticed that a lot of reporters are noting that Saddam might not be in control. I realize we're trying to prosecute a war here, but my question is: wouldn't you want there to be some control so a vacuum doesn't occur? Coalition forces do not control much of Iraq yet...they haven't captured a major city (just border towns and a few larger ports) yet.
Just curious, and think of this as an open thread.